The rule, exactly. Before an election each citizen chooses: to vote — or to take a payment and not vote in that election. The payment is a percentage of the median income, set by referendum; there is no fixed sum. One ballot is one vote, with no multiplier in the count; the vote is amplified only in that each ballot's share grows as others step out. The budget pays under law; a candidate never pays. Only a referendum of all citizens — simple majority, no quorum — introduces, changes or repeals the rule.
The protocol has been introduced nowhere and no pilot has been run: shares, turnout and outcome figures in the chapters are estimates, and the protocol promises nobody an election victory. If a chapter says otherwise, Exact Answers and the Charter are correct. For a candidate: ten questions and ten steps. For a citizen, a mayor, a finance officer, a donor, a journalist, a scholar, a lawyer: answers by role. Everything in force in one file: llms-full.txt.
The Short AB-EXIT Manifesto (street register)¶
Chapter: 07 — Social Architecture and Manifesto File: 07_033b · v3 · 12 June 2026 · successor to YUNO Short Manifesto v2 Register: street. For a leaflet, a landing page, a post, a video. The academic register is §33 and §13.
An early-draft layer (note of 01.10.2026 after audit 040m). "A month's wages", "~$676" and "up to twice" are examples: the size of the payment is set by a percentage approved by referendum, and "twice", "double weight" and "a double ticket" are the arithmetic of a share when half exit, not a rule: every ballot counts as one. The exact-answers sheet 1d and the charter 048m are in force.
You have never been paid for your vote.
But it is paid for. To everyone except you.
Parties receive money from the budget — for every vote cast for them. In Germany — about a euro per vote. In France — almost one and a half. TV channels receive billions for the advertising they run at you before elections. Political consultants make fortunes for studying you like a fish in an aquarium and picking the bait.
Your vote is money. You just aren't the one who gets it.
Now look at what happens when you don't vote. Nothing. Nobody notices you. You are not dangerous. You can be ignored. Half the country doesn't go to the polls — and the system has learned to pretend that's how it should be. Your silence costs it nothing.
AB-EXIT does one thing: it puts a price tag on your vote. Your price tag.
Before every election — two options. Button A: you go and vote as before — but your vote weighs more, because some people have exited. Up to twice as much. Button B: you officially say "this time — without me" — and the state pays you. Not the party. Not the channel. You. A percentage of your country's median wage — which one is decided by open debate and a referendum. In order of magnitude, a month's wages for five minutes in an app, once per election.
Next cycle you choose again. Nothing is taken away. Ever.
Don't like the show — you get paid to leave the hall. Like it — your ticket is now double.
And in both cases the main thing happens: you stop being invisible. Voted — you were counted with double weight. Exited — you were counted and paid. The third option — "you simply don't exist" — no longer exists.
Who is against? Those who now receive money for your vote. Party treasuries. Political consultants. Everyone who feeds off your free silence or your free anger. Ask any of them: "Why can't I get what you get — for what is mine?" Listen to the answer. There won't be one. In a year nobody has managed to break this question — including six artificial intelligences that were paid to look for holes.
No sitting politician will offer you this first. It doesn't pay him. So you offer it — to him. As a question.
The system has two exits: either the state pays you for your vote — or one day your vote again becomes someone's weapon. Free. As always.
Your vote. Your money. Your exit.
ABEXIT · ab-exit.com · the formula, the charter and full calculations — docs.ab-exit.com¶
Layout notes: 60 lines ≈ one A5 leaflet / one landing-page screen / 90 seconds of video. "Up to twice" is the honest caveat of the limiting case (exit 50 %). Sums are localised: ~$676 (median $45K), ~£700 (UK), ~$200 (Moldova). Compared with v2 (YUNO): brand replaced, "4 years" → "cycle", added the formula, both-buttons visibility, the question as a weapon, the fork; removed "comedy" (tone), "twice" softened to "up to twice".